What is Patent Prosecution?

Patent prosecution refers to the legal process through which an individual or a company seeks to obtain a patent from the patent office, typically the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). It involves a series of steps aimed at securing exclusive rights for a new invention. In patent law, “prosecution” refers to the ongoing dialogue between the applicant (or their attorney) and the patent office, unlike its use in criminal law. This process includes the drafting, filing, examination, and, ultimately, the issuance of a patent.

Patent prosecution can be divided into two primary phases: pre-grant prosecution and post-grant prosecution. Pre-grant prosecution focuses on obtaining the patent, while post-grant prosecution deals with actions that may be necessary after the patent is granted, such as maintenance and enforcing rights. Whether you’re an inventor, business owner, or entrepreneur, grasping the fundamentals of patent prosecution is essential for safeguarding your intellectual property.

1. Pre-Filing Activities

Before filing a patent application, it’s essential to take several preparatory steps. The first step involves ensuring that the invention is indeed patentable. An idea must meet certain criteria: it must be novel, useful, and non-obvious. This requires conducting a patentability search to determine if similar patents or prior art already exist that might prevent you from obtaining a patent.

At this stage, inventors often work with patent attorneys to draft a comprehensive patent disclosure, which details the invention’s unique aspects, how it works, and its potential applications. Another consideration during pre-filing is whether to file a provisional patent application, which allows inventors to secure an early filing date while providing additional time to prepare a full utility patent application.

2. Filing the Patent Application

The next stage in patent prosecution is filing the actual patent application. There are different types of patent applications, including utility patents, design patents, and plant patents. The most common type, utility patents, protect new and useful inventions or discoveries, while design patents cover the ornamental design of a functional item.

A utility patent application typically includes several critical components:

• Claims: A clear definition of the invention’s boundaries and legal scope.
• Drawings or Diagrams: Visual depictions of the invention.
• Specifications: A written description of the invention detailing how it works, its construction, and its purpose.
• Abstract: A summary of the invention’s key elements.

Once the application is submitted, the USPTO assigns it to an examiner, and the patent prosecution process officially begins.

Also Read: How Much Does A Patent Lawyer Cost?

3. Examination Process

After the application is filed, the USPTO begins the examination process. During this stage, a patent examiner reviews the application to ensure it complies with patent laws and determines whether the invention is patentable. The examiner checks the claims against existing patents, prior art, and legal requirements for patentability (novelty, usefulness, and non-obviousness).

The examiner may issue an initial rejection or approval based on their review. This stage often involves back-and-forth communication between the examiner and the applicant, with the examiner raising objections or requests for clarification.

4. Responding to Office Actions

A significant part of patent prosecution involves responding to Office Actions, which are official communications from the patent examiner. Office Actions can either be non-final, where the examiner raises issues that can be corrected, or final, indicating that no further amendments will be considered unless appealed.

Common reasons for rejections include:

• Lack of novelty or obviousness
• Insufficient description or drawings
• Claims that are too broad or unclear

When faced with an Office Action, applicants must respond within a specified time frame (usually 3 to 6 months). The applicant can either amend their claims to address the examiner’s objections or argue that the examiner’s rejection is unwarranted.

5. Appeals Process

The appeals process is a crucial stage in patent prosecution when an applicant disagrees with the examiner’s final decision. If the examiner rejects a patent application after all responses and amendments, the applicant has the right to appeal to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB).

• Filing a Notice of Appeal: The applicant files a notice with the USPTO to begin the appeal. The notice informs the patent office that the applicant intends to challenge the examiner’s decision.
• Submitting an Appeal Brief: After filing the notice, the applicant must submit an appeal brief, which outlines the arguments against the examiner’s decision. This brief typically includes a summary of the invention, claims, the examiner’s objections, and legal arguments supporting the applicant’s position.
• Examiner’s Answer: The examiner can respond to the appeal brief by either standing by their decision or revising it based on the applicant’s arguments.
• Oral Hearing (Optional): In some cases, the applicant may request an oral hearing before the PTAB to present additional arguments or clarify specific points in the appeal brief. This is an opportunity for the applicant to discuss the case in person.
• PTAB Decision: The PTAB reviews all submitted materials and issues a decision. The board can either affirm the examiner’s rejection, reverse it, or send the application back to the examiner for further review.

6. Patent Issuance

Once all hurdles in the examination process have been overcome, the patent examiner issues a Notice of Allowance, meaning the patent will be granted pending payment of the required fees. This is one of the most rewarding stages of patent prosecution as it signifies that the invention meets all legal requirements for patentability.

Payment of Issue Fee: After receiving the Notice of Allowance, the applicant must pay the issue fee to the USPTO within a set period (usually three months). If this fee is not paid, the application will be considered abandoned.

Patent Publication: Once the issue fee is paid, the USPTO will formally issue the patent. The patent details, including the invention’s specifications and claims, are published, making them available to the public. The inventor receives an official patent certificate, which serves as proof of their rights to the invention.

With a granted patent, the patent holder secures the exclusive ability to prohibit others from creating, using, distributing, or importing the patented invention without authorization. These rights are protected for a term of 20 years from the filing date for utility patents (with some exceptions), allowing the patent owner to commercialize their invention or license it to others.

7. Patent Maintenance

Patent maintenance is essential to keep your granted patent in force throughout its full term. In the USA once a patent is issued, the holder must pay maintenance fees at specific intervals to maintain their exclusive rights.

When Are Maintenance Fees Due?

For utility patents in the USA., maintenance fees are required three times over the patent’s lifespan:

1. 3.5 years after the patent is granted
2. 7.5 years after the patent is granted
3. 11.5 years after the patent is granted

If the patent holder fails to pay these fees on time, the patent will expire and enter the public domain, meaning others can use the invention without facing infringement claims.

8. Post-Grant Procedures

After a patent is granted, several legal procedures can affect its standing. Post-grant procedures help to ensure that the patent remains valid, enforceable, and appropriately protected against challenges or errors.

Common Post-Grant Procedures:

1. Post-Grant Review (PGR): Within nine months of the patent issuance, third parties can challenge the patent’s validity via a post-grant review. This challenge may be based on grounds such as prior art that wasn’t considered during the initial examination.
2. Inter Partes Review (IPR): An alternative to PGR, inter partes review can be requested by a third party after the nine-month window. IPR allows the challenger to dispute the patent’s validity based on prior art and other technical grounds.
3. Reissue Applications: If a patent holder realizes there are errors in the granted patent (such as inaccurate claims or inadequate descriptions), they can file a reissue application to correct these mistakes. However, the scope of the patent claims cannot be expanded during reissue.
4. Ex Parte Reexamination: Either the patent holder or a third party can request an ex parte reexamination if new prior art is discovered that might affect the patent’s validity. If the USPTO agrees, it will reexamine the claims to determine if the patent should be upheld, amended, or canceled.
5. Patent Infringement Litigation: Post-grant, the patent owner may need to enforce their rights through litigation if someone infringes on the patent. As a result of this legal action, you may receive monetary compensation or a ruling to cease the infringing behavior.

Final Thoughts

Patent prosecution is a multifaceted process that doesn’t end with the issuance of a patent. Securing a patent from the initial filing through examination and responding to office actions demands persistence, legal knowledge, and meticulous attention to detail. Even after a patent is granted, there are essential steps to maintain and defend your patent rights, such as paying maintenance fees and navigating potential post-grant challenges.

For inventors and businesses alike, understanding the intricacies of patent prosecution is vital to protecting intellectual property. Whether you’re at the pre-filing stage, appealing a rejection, or ensuring the long-term validity of your patent, working with a skilled patent attorney can make all the difference in securing and maintaining your patent rights.

FAQs